JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)December 19, 2011

A- de 2011

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo

✓Claimant Giomar Angelica Aguilar Gonzalez·Respondent Sin Información

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Adicion De Sentencia
  • Procedencia mediante sentencia complementaria según Código de Procedimiento Civil
Juez De Tutela
  • Margen de discrecionalidad en virtud del cual es excusado de la obligación de abordar la totalidad de los problemas planteados
Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Reiteración improcedencia de aclaración o adición
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de Adición de la sentencia T-592/10.

El memorialista solicita adicionar el fallo de la referencia, en el sentido de establecer “desde cuándo la entidad demandada debe pagar la pensión de sobrevivientes al accionante.

La Sala de Revisión RECHAZA por improcedente la solicitud de adición impetrada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. RECHAZAR por improcedente la solicitud de adicion de la sentencia T- 592 de 2010 dictada por la Sala Segunda de Revision el 27 de julio de 2010, por las razones expuestas en esta providencia.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR a la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion que dirija comunicacion, informando lo resuelto en el presente auto a la senora Giomar Angelica Aguilar Gonzalez
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.